Stamp duty: Is the pressure mounting to reform property tax?
The stamp duty holiday, ending in 2021, had a huge impact on the property market, with repercussions still felt today in soaring house prices. This begs the question: is it time to reform this property tax? Mark Armstrong, Group Chief Executive Officer at Reapit, shares his thoughts.
A guest blog by Mark Armstrong, Group Chief Executive Officer, Reapit
I don’t think anyone would argue with me when I say that 2021 was a good year for the property industry. Activity remained buoyant as the year came to a close, with the busiest levels of house buying since 2006. The stamp duty holiday has no doubt played a significant role, catalysing a market that was coming out of the cold the previous summer, as well as a surge of pent-up demand in general that pushed a backlog of activity to the front of the line.
Despite some negative projections, a Covid-era (and that’s the last time I’ll mention the C-word) sales slump didn’t come to pass, and, although we can’t know what the future might bring, it’s fair to say that the past year could have been much worse. As we launch full swing into the new year, I would like to take a look back at the impact of the stamp duty holiday, and what should happen next for the bane of house buyers.
Boom and growth
Activity and house price growth were the headlines of 2021, catalysed unequivocally by the stamp duty holiday launched in June last year and buoyed by the unfortunate supply deficiencies keeping stock low and prices high. The mad rush to complete by the end of June climaxed a year of frenetic activity which, arguably, had some mixed results overall.
According to research from LSE on the lessons from the stamp duty holiday, an additional 100,000 transactions were estimated to have been completed in the final few months of the initial holiday period, as a direct result of the levy removal.
Commenting on the report, Mark Bogard, CEO of the Family Building Society said: "The stamp duty holiday has been a very elegantly crafted experiment, resulting in a 50 percent increase in transactions, leading to a better use of the housing stock, as well as supporting the Government's levelling up agenda.”
Now, this is a positive outlook, albeit one laden with caveats. Yes, the stamp duty holiday was certainly good on paper for transactions and of course for many house buyers – with savings of up to a maximum of £15,000.
Perhaps more so however, the associated economic activity was the real boon, with a total induced expenditure ranging from £1.8-£2.7 billion (along with multiplier effects) all feeding into the wider economy.
With all that said, there’s a dark side to this economic tale, and it won’t have escaped anyone that this twist is the significant rise in house prices over the past year.
According to the latest figures from the ONS, average house prices in the UK were up 10.2% over the year to October 2021, putting average prices £24,000 higher than in September 2020.
No small sum, and for first-time buyers trying to raise a deposit, that’s a considerably higher hurdle to jump to reach the bottom rung.
The conversation around the SDLT has become increasingly poignant last year, with arguments on both sides over whether the levy should be reduced or abolished entirely.
Many agents have certainly been calling for it to be at the very least reformed in some way, and this extends to consumers as well: the LSE report aforementioned above found in its survey for the Family Building Society that the majority of respondents were in favour of extending the holiday permanently, with the main reasons being that 1) it puts money in the economy (62%), 2) it encourages mobility (53%), 3) it encourages rightsizing (53%), and 4) it simplifies the process of moving (44%).
An argument for abolishing stamp duty, or at least maintaining the nil rate at £500,000, is that it could help to reduce distortions in the housing and labour markets.
That said, statistics suggest that transactions were already increasing well before the holiday could have had any impact and that the holiday at least helped the market to match pre-pandemic levels.
Certainly, it’s fair to say that stamp duty is considered a "bad tax", with taxes in general always being unpopular, but this one often stings more than it supports.
On the flip side, given that house price increases outweighed the maximum potential stamp duty savings over the last year, it could also be argued that the holiday did more harm than good.
2022: a time for reform?
As we launch into the new year there are certainly new challenges that await its various stakeholders – from professionals to the buyers and sellers. House price growth is expected to cool in the coming months, perhaps a welcome sight for buyers agonising over the consistent rise in house prices.
But this will be tempered by the underwhelming supply of new stock to the market, as well as deficiencies in the house building industry that make a mockery of the government’s "levelling up" agenda.
Adjacent to all of this is the increasing negative concern over the general view of unaffordability within the housing market, with house price growth exceeding average wage growth to the extent that it’s becoming increasingly difficult for first-time buyers to save for a deposit.
Perhaps another stamp duty holiday will be mooted in future as a means of jumpstarting the market in times of trouble, but I find it unlikely that such a holiday again will ever be a permanent fixture; it generates too much tax revenue and its influence on house prices bears repeating.
However, reforming the SDLT is a stronger argument, and a missed opportunity in October’s Budget, given its impact. The Bank of England tightened the belt on 16 December when it changed interest rates to 0.25%, and mortgage rates have started to creep up in response.
Reducing the tax burden on the buyer and especially giving a boost to first-time buyers will help a new generation get on the ladder and support growth in the market.
But supply must meet demand, and the government’s house building agenda (and house builders) must be given a kick as part of wider reform to stabilise the market in 2022.